TEA AND COFFEE
Physical, Intellectual, and Moral Effects
By Dr. William A. Alcott,
Author of “The Library of Health,” “House I Live In,” “Vegetable Diet,” “Health Tracts,” “Use of Tobacco,” etc.
Fifth Stereotype Edition.
Published by Samuel R. Wells,
No. 389 Broadway.
TEA AND COFFEE.
Part I. – TEA.
HISTORY OF TEA.
Exhilarating properties of tea. Its introduction into Europe. Amount consumed. Increase of this consumption.
That every variety of tea sold in our American market, if good for anything, is, in a greater or less degree, exciting or exhilarating, is, I believe, generally known. Few would long continue to use an article – even with the addition of cream, milk or sugar – which had no other effect on the system than that of pure water, viz., to quench thirst.
Of the nature and extent of the excitement produced by tea, however, most persons appear to be ignorant. They are, in all probability, little aware that it pervades, by its influence, the whole vital domain; and so far as it excites or exhilarates at all does it by affecting the brain and nervous system, the stomach, heart, liver, etc., in nearly the same way with distilled and fermentated liquors, opium and tobacco. They rarely suspect that they are admitting to their embrace, in the guise of a friend, a most insidious and dangerous enemy – one who is silently, though slowly, undermining and destroying the very citadel of life itself. That such is the fact, however, I shall be compelled by a stern regard for truth, to prove.
Tea does not appear to have been known, in Europe or America, till about two hundred years ago. Now as Europe has been settled more than 3200 years, it follows that not less than 10,000,000,000 of its earlier inhabitants must have gone down to the grave without the knowledge of tea, while not more than about 500,000,000, or one twentieth part as many, have ever tasted it. Whether among the immense host who lived and dies without this Chinese beverage, there was any want of that physical vigor which enables men to till the soil, raise a structure, and fight the battles of their countries, may be left to the decision of those who are familiar with the scanty records of Greece, Rome, Britain, and the other mighty or polished nations, who, having had their infancy, maturity and decrepitude, are now well nigh forgotten.
The tea plant, of which there are two varieties – the viridis or green, and the bohea or black tea – is a native of China and Japan; and was for a long time confined to those countries. Of late, however, attempts have been made to cultivate it in the island of Java; and with the aid of Chinese laborers, in Brazil; and about twelve years ago it was introduced into France. It is highly probably that this plant, in both of its varieties, might be cultivated, indeed I fear it will be – in the United States.
I have said that tea did not find its way into Europe till about two hundred years ago. The East India Company appear to have imported it, in 1664. they brought two pound and two ounces of it, as a present to the British king. From that time to the present, its use has been increasing – sometimes more, sometimes less rapidly. The present yearly consumption of the article in Great Britain is variously estimated, but can hardly be less than 50,000,000 pounds. The other European countries use much less in proportion to their population; though in Russia and Holland the consumption is becoming considerable. France consumes but little, but what is wanting in tea, they make up in coffee, wine and tobacco.
Perhaps no country of Europe or America makes so much use of tea as the United States; its use, moreover, is rapidly increasing. In 1821, the amount imported was a little short of 5,000,000 pound. In 1836 – fifteen years afterward – it was 16,382,114. The increase, however, was the most rapid between the years 1830 and 1836 – being about 100 percent; while that between 1821 and 1828 was little more than 50 percent. A small part of the importations of each year were re-exported; but never, probably, to the extent of 2,000,000 pounds.
The amount imported from 1821 to 1838, inclusive of those two years, was something more than 150,000,000 pounds, at an estimated cost of the consumers of $125,000,000. That between 1834 and 1837 – four years – was over $60,000,000. The amount likely to be imported and consumed, between 1838 and 1850, allowing an average annual increase equal to that of the years 1833 to 1837, is about 240,000,000 pounds; and the expense, without reckoning the time, cost of fuel, etc., employed in its preparation, will probably fall but little short of $150,000,000.
-------- o --------
TEA A MEDICINE.
General remarks. Tea shown to be a medicinal substance. Effects produced by it. Experiment by a dentist of New York.
The object of the present chapter will be to show that tea, in all its varieties, and in all circumstances, is really and truly a medicine.
Who does not know that “a good cup of tea,” as it is called, taken either at the close of a fatiguing day’s work, or when we are drowsy, will remove the fatigue or dispel the drowsiness? Who has not read, in the life of that distinguished and philanthropic teacher, Anthony Benezet, that he always removed the fatigue of the school-room, by strong tea? And how many literary men have done, and are still doing that which is essentially the same?
But we need not go abroad very far in search of examples of the exciting or medicinal qualities of this substance. We find people, everywhere, especially females, in the daily use of this beverage, either to relieve fatigue, or to dispel drowsiness or pain. Yet no intelligent person, it is believed, will pretend, for one moment, that his strength is restore by the nutriment of the tea; for if there be any, it can only be in very small quantity. It takes some time – usually from two to four hours – for a substance to go through the whole digestive process, and be converted into blood, and give us strength in that way. Whereas the relief from tea is definitely sudden; almost instantaneous. It comes, doubtless, through the medium of the nervous system. The nerves of the stomach are excited – in other words – irritated – by the substance received; the irritation is conveyed to the brain; and this last is roused to impart an increased, though short-lived energy to the whole system.
Now whether this increased energy of the system – this fictitious strength – is imparted by tea, coffee, opium, alcohol or tobacco, or by several of them conjoined, makes, in my view, very little difference. None of these substances for a particle of blood, or give any natural, healthy strength. They only give strength by nervous irritation, and relieve fatigue or induce sleep, by the nervous depression or exhaustion which follows; and which is always in proportion to the previous excitement. The female who restores her strength by tea, the laborer who regains strength by spirituous liquors, and the Turk who recruits his energies by his pill of opium, are in precisely the same condition; so far, I mean, as the stimulation, merely, is concerned.
It has been said that the first effects of tea are exciting. Certain it is, that not a few tea drinkers, at times, so far lose their powers of self-possession and self-command, as to say and do many things which, in their cooler hours, they deeply regret. Not only is the tongue loose, but the whole countenance is flushed, and the eye preternaturally animated. In truth, as in the case of receiving a moderate dose of opium or alcohol, the vital energies are roused to a degree which changes even the gait; and perhaps, for a time, promotes general activity and industry.
But it is in the sedative or depressing effects of tea that we find the strongest proof of its medicinal character. Besides, if it did not first raise us above the line of healthy action, we should never find ourselves sinking so far below it afterward.
Among the indications that the system is suffering from the sedative, depressing, or secondary effects of tea, are headache, wakefulness, palpitation of the heart; trembling; loss of appetite; indigestion; nervous prostration; great susceptibility to fatigue; and chronic affections of the vital organs, accompanied often by emaciation, sallowness of the skin, and a peculiar appearance of the surface of the body, that reminds one of the applications of an astringent.*
It ought, however, to be observed, in connection with the last mentioned indication, that if the countenance is naturally fresh, it may in some instances require many years to induce the change of color. Nor is it denied that other influences may combine with the tea to produce any of the symptoms which have been mentioned.
Who are they that complain most of nervousness, irregular appetite and sleep, unequal warmth and strength, and general ill health? Who suffer most from the dread of poverty, misfortune, sickness, death, and future woe? Who find most fault with the work around them, and with the dispensations and arrangements of Divine Providence? Who complain most of the emptiness and sickliness of all things below the sin? I do not ask who entertains the strongest belief in the vanity of all sublunary things, but who complains and frets most? Assuredly, they are the individuals who use the most nervous excitants; among whom tea and coffee drinkers often have the pre-eminence. Not, indeed, when under the first influence of their favorite beverage, but whole they are suffering from its sedative or secondary effects.
But this leads me to say, that tea is even show to be a sedative medicine by its effects. Dr. Burdell, a dentist of New York, having often noticed the great nervousness of tea drinkers, made the following experiment:
Having steeped a pound of young hyson tea in pure soft water, and strained out the grounds, the liquor was subsequently evaporated to half a pint. This extract was applied to the nerves of those teeth which required an operation in order to lessen their sensibility, and thus prevent at least a part of the pain. The experiment was attended with complete success; and he has ever since continued the use of the extract in this way, it is said, this substance may be used as an effectual substitute for opium, oil of cloves, creosote and arsenic, all of which have been more or less used by the mass of the people, and even by dentists themselves, for the purpose of lessening or destroying the sensibility of the dental nerves.
-------- o --------
TEA A POSITIVE POISON.
Every medicine a poison. Particular evidence in regard to tea. The tea disease. Ten cases of disease caused by tea. Testimony of various authors on the effects of tea on the human system.
It may be said, perhaps, that to treat of tea as both a medicine and a poison, is to make a distinction without a difference, since every efficient medicine is a poison of course. There is truth in the suggestion; nevertheless it is more convenient to arrange my thoughts on the subject under two separate heads.
One evidence that tea is poisonous, is found in the fact that, like alcohol, stramonium, belladonna, and many other medicines, it produces its specific disease – the tea disease. This part of our subject will be best illustrated by the experiments and deductions of Mr. John Cole, a distinguished member of the Royal College of Surgeons in London.
Mr. Cole does not, indeed, attempt to show that every tea drinker has the tea disease: a point as difficult to establish as that every one who uses alcoholic drinks of any kind has the drunkard’s disease. All who use tea, however, are on the high road to the tea disease, just as every dram drinker, and in truth every wine, cider and beer drinker, is on the road to delirium tremens.
There is one thing, moreover, which seems a little peculiar in relation to the effects of tea. Though it disturbs, most readily, those constitutions whose tone has been lowered from the healthy standard, by fatigue, debility, loss of blood, etc., yet it has also the power, when taken a long time in excessive quantity, of reducing the health constitution to that state in which it become accessible to its own deleterious influence. The following is his description; the progress of the disease, in those whose systems were already prepared to be injuriously affected by it.
“In a longer or short time after taking the beverage, (from a few minutes to two or three hours,) an uncomfortable feeling arises in the stomach – a craving, sinking emptiness – which soon acquired a degree of intensity that is almost insupportable. The hunger-like gnawing and craving are described as being, and to the last degree, painful to endure. The stomach being full, has no effect in preventing its accession; neither does eating to relieve it. This is often all that is felt for a long time; but by degrees a fluttering, as of a bird, in the left side, is superadded; and a feeling of fullness pervades the chest, with breathless and frequent sighing. The fullness is more especially felt about the clavicles, (or collar bones,) and the root of the neck.
“When black tea or coffee has been taken, considerable excitement often ushers in this succession of phenomena; the face becomes flushed, the eyes sparkle with unusual brilliance; all the earlier effects of intoxication from alcohol are observable – the pulse being full and throbbing, and considerably quickened. If green tea have been taken, the previous excitement isles, or perhaps not at all perceptible; the skin soon becomes pale, the eyes become sunken, the pulse feeble, quick and fluttering, or slow and weak.
“Whichever may have been taken, in the progress of the affection, the hands and feet often become cold as marble and bedewed with a clammy sweat. Efforts to warm them are made in vain, even in the hottest weather; a feeling of coldness and numbness also invades the back part of the head.
“This is the milder form of the disease, (if I may so term it,) the one which is most commonly seen; but occasionally a variety of aggravated symptoms arise. To the coldness and benumbed feeling of the back of the head, there is added formication of the scalp, (sensation as if ants were creeping in it,) violent pain in the head, dimness of the sight, unsteadiness in walking, and vertigo; and these are accompanied by a fluttering, feeble pulse. To the feeling of fullness of the chest and about the clavicles, are added threatening of suffocation, insensibility, and convulsions. The sufferings felt in the stomach are aggravated to violent spasms. The flutterings at the heart become pain, violent palpitation, or enfeebled action, bringing on a syncope. I may add, here, that the mind does not escape injury, but partakes of the disorders of the body, as is seen by the temper becoming peevish and irritable, so as to render the sufferer a torment to all about him.”
Who does not see, in a substance that can induce all these mischiefs on the living system, a less sever though certain poison? Is there a possibility of mistake?
But Mr. C. brings forward a list of ten cases of disease from tea drinking, of which the following is an abstract. It should be premised, however, that except during what he calls paroxysms, this distinguished surgeon was not in the habit of giving medicine – relying solely, for a cure, on total abstinence from the drinks which produced this mischief.
His first case was that of a female, thirty-five years of age, who complained of great pain in the stomach after eating, with a sense of sinking and emptiness, and such a feeling of faintness that she could hardly walk, followed by fluttering in the side, fullness about the clavicles, and vomiting.
The second was that of a female, forty years of age. She was just recovering from catarrhal fever, when one morning after taking her breakfast, she was seized with symptoms similar to those already mentioned, except the vomiting. It appeared on inquiry that her tea that morning (it was black tea) had been made stronger than usual, and that she had also drank more than was customary with her.
His third case was that of a female, thirty years of age, who had long been in the use of very strong green tea, in large quantity. For a year before Mr. C. was called, she had been subject to violent spasms of the stomach, which had at times become so frequent and sever, that the slightest exertion, even a little walking, was sufficient to bring them on. When Mr. C arrived, she was suffering from spasms of unusual violence. She had likewise the other usual symptoms of tea disease. On inquiry, he was fully satisfied that all the trouble, in this case, was the effect of tea. She was directed to abstain from it; and for several weeks had no return of the spasms, nor any other symptom particular of disease. But one day, on venturing upon a single cup of her favorite beverage, she had a slight attack of her old complaint. She resumed her abstinence, and remained well.
The fourth case was that of another female, thirty years old. She had the usual symptoms of tea disease, or tea poison, with the usual nervous suffering. The tea she had used was green tea. She had been in the use of digitalis and colchicum a fortnight, with no other effect than to add to her sufferings, as might have been expected from the addition of two more poisons to the one which was already undermining her constitution. She abstained from tea, and in three days recovered.
The fifth case was that of a female, twenty-five years of age, famous in her profession of tea drinking. Mr. C. prohibited tea as usual; but was surprised to find, after having made his daily visits for a week or so, she was no better. On a more rigid search, he found she was still indulging herself clandestinely. She complied, at length with his prohibition, and in a few days was well.
Case sixth was that of an author and parliamentary reporter, of middle age. He was a green tea drinker – sometimes using it strong, as his common drink, for five or six hours together, to keep up his mental strength. He had become so enslaved, that two or three times a week, he was found lying in a state of insensibility on the floor.
A middle aged mother was the seventh. She had been subject for some time to occasional fits of insensibility, which occurred in the evening. She had used black tea twice a day, which Mr. C., suspecting to be the cause of the mischief, forbade her, and she quickly recovered – I should have said that the had taken the strongest medicines without success.
A shop-keeper, forty years of age, is next mentioned. He was not only a great tea-drinker, but also a coffee drinker. His head was more affected than that of the others. To total abstinence from every drink but water was added, in this case, for ten days, a little valerian.
The ninth case was that of a young man of twenty-two – a great drunkard, even at this early age, on black tea. In addition to the other symptoms of tea disease, he was at length attacked with bleeding at the nose, and convulsions. He was cured in the usual manner, in a very short time.
The last case mentioned is that of a female – a most devoted slave of the tea-pot. She had been suffering long, but would not abandon the cause of her suffering, till a severe cough with a bloody expectoration, compelled her to do it.
Mr. C. concludes his remarks by observing – “I could extend the number of cases so as to form a body of evidence which it would be difficult to resist. Those I have brought forward are, I think, sufficient to excite considerable doubt as to the harmless qualities of
“The cups that cheer, but not inebriate.”
“If it be true,” he adds, “that the continued disturbance of the function of an organ will induce change of structure, what are we to expect from the use of tea twice a day, when it deranges the function of the heart for three or four hours after each time of its being taken? If the answer be that it may be expected to produce some structural disease, then there arises this other question – May not the greater prevalence of cardiac (or heart) disease, of late years, have been considerably influence by the increased consumption of tea and coffee?
But Mr. Cole is not the only individual who has suspected tea of containing poison. Distinguished men of both hemispheres have entertained the same suspicions; and several have verified them by experiment.
“As early as 1767,” says Mr. Graham, in his Lectures on the Science of Human Life, “Dr. Smith, of Edinburgh, demonstrated, by a series of careful experiments, that an infusion of green tea has the same effect as henbane, tobacco, cicuta, etc., on the living tissues of the animal properties. In 1772 Dr. Lettsom, of Ireland, made a series of similar experiments, with similar results. And still later, Dr. Beddoes, of England, by a series of experiments, several times repeated, completely demonstrated that tea is as powerfully destructive to life as laurel water, opium, or digitalis. Indeed, it is entirely certain that a small quantity of a strong decoction of tea or coffee will destroy human life, in one unaccustomed to the use of it, as quickly as an equal quantity of laudanum.” Dr. Beddoes applied a strong decoction of tea to hears just taken from living frogs, which extinguished their vitality almost instantly.
Dr. Cullen, a Scotch physician of great eminence, whose writings are among the standard books of our best medical schools, observes that “scientific experiments prove than an infusion of green tea has the effect to destroy the sensibility of the nerves, and the irritability of the muscles.” He says still further, and without excluding black tea, (the properties of which, as we shall see presently, are essentially the same with those of the green tea, only more active) – “From the experiments above mentioned, and from the observations which I have made in the course of fifty years, upon all sorts of persons, I am convinced that the properties of tea are both narcotic and sedative.
But what does Dr. Cullen mean by narcotics? His definition is – “As their power and operation (that of narcotics generally) may be extended so far as to extinguish the vital principle altogether, they form that set of substances which properly and strictly may be called poisonous.”
Dr. Combe, in his work on Digestion and Dietetics, observes, that “when made very strong, or taken in large quantity, especially late in the evening, they (tea and coffee) not only ruin the stomach, but very seriously derange the health of the brain and nervous system.
The Encyclopedia Americana says – “The effects of tea on the human system are those of a very mild narcotic taken in small quantities – that is exhilarating.”
The Catechism of Health, usually attributed to Dr. Bell, of Philadelphia, says that “tea (black tea I suppose he means, as well as green) when drank strong and in large quantity, impairs the powers of the stomach, produces various nervous symptoms,” etc.
Prof. Sweetser, of New York, in a work on Digestion and its Disorders, says of both kinds of tea, black and green, that owing to a volatile oil they contain, they are both stimulant to the nervous system.” After proceeding to mention all or nearly all the effects which have been described to tea by Mr. Cole and others, and noticing the custom of physicians of referring them to other causes rather than the tea, he concludes by saying – “I am inclined to think that the evil is to be ascribed to the peculiar properties of the tea itself.”
Dr. Hooper, in his Medical Dictionary, says – “Tea, in its natural state, is a narcotic plant, on account of which the Chinese refrain from its use till it has been divested of this property by keeping it at least twelve months. When taken too copiously, it is apt to occasion weakness, tremor, palsies, and various other symptoms, arising from narcotic plants.”
“Not a case of sick headache,” says Dr. Burdell, of New York, “has ever occurred within my knowledge, except with the drinkers of narcotic drinks, (meaning tea and coffee,) and not a case has failed of cure, on the entire renunciation of these drinks.”
Dr. Beaumont, a surgeon in the United States army, whose experiments have attracted the attention of the whole medical world, says – “Even coffee and tea, the common beverage of all classes of people, have a tendency to debilitate the digestive organs. Let anyone who is in the habit of drinking either of these articles in a weak decoction, take two or three cups made very strong, and he will soon be aware of their injurious tendency. Yet this is only an addition to the strength of the narcotic he is in the constant habit of using.”
The reader will observe that Dr. Beaumont calls tea, no less than coffee, a narcotic. His testimony, with many, will be the more valuable, when it is know that he does not bring it to support a theory, but as the result of mere experiment – in other words, as matter of pure science.
Green tea, moreover, is spoken of, in some of our journals, especially the Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, as being very efficient, as a remedy in the case of burns and scalds, on account, most unquestionably, of its narcotic, anodyne, or poisonous properties. The Transylvania Journal of Medicine regards it as any anodyne; as truly so, in some cases, as opium.
But I have not yet done. From the busy commercial world are derived the following curious and interesting statements.
The London Quarterly Review says there is a manufactory near Canton in China, where the worst kinds of coarse black tea are converted into green tea, by heating the leaves moderately on iron, and white lead; by which process it acquires a blooming blue color, not unlike that of plums, and that crispy appearance which is supposed to indicate the fine green teas. The writer says he saw 50,000 chests of this spurious article ready for shipping, and on inquiring for what market it was intended, was told that it was for the American.
Other statements speak of Prussian blue and plaster of Paris; but whatever the truth in the case may be, we have reason, at the least, to suspect that a large share of the teas imported, are damaged, or worthless teas, manufactured to suit the market. The Americans must have tea, and the Chinese, an accommodating people are ready to furnish them with it!
It is said, I know, that if it could be proved that the green teas are poisonous, the same testimony cannot be brought against black tea. But I have endeavored to show, from various authorities, that even black teas com in for a share of poison. Mr. Brande, the distinguished chemist, has ascertained, by actual and patient experiment, that there is no perceptible difference, in this respect, between green teas and black teas.
Suppose, however, it were not so. Admit, for the moment, that black tea is harmless. How small a proportion of this sort of tea is consumed among us: The proportion of the various kinds of black teas imported, amount to only six-twentieths of the whole, as may be seen by the following table:
Bohea, ………………………………. 1-20th of the whole.
Souchong and other black teas, …. 5-20ths of the whole.
Hyson and Young Hyson, ……….. 9-20ths of the whole.
Hyson Skin & other green teas, …. 4-20ths of the whole.
Imperial and Gunpowder, ……….. 1-20th of the whole.
-------- o --------
TENDENCY TO DISEASE.
injures the teeth. How. Hot and cold drinks. Neglect of
mastication. Use of tea by ancestors. Effects on the senses. Tea
always more or less injurious.
In speaking of tea as a medicine, I have had occasion to prove, at length, its tendency to produce what Mr. Cole has denominated the tea disease; and under both that and another head, have more than alluded to its efficacy in producing headache, dyspepsia, etc. In this chapter, I shall endeavor to come to particulars.
Tea injures the teeth, indirectly, and induces premature decay. The vulgar belief, that hot, cold, sweet and acrid substances injure the teeth by mere contact, is probably untrue. Not even mercury does this, nor henbane, nor hemlock. A very powerful and highly concentrated acid might indeed do it, if they were unhappily exposed to it. The injury, however, it usually done in what may be called an indirect manner. Let us consider this subject.
It is a generally received doctrine, among medical men, that whatever injures the gums, injures the teeth, through that medium. Now many things which are received into the mouth injure the gums. Every thing which is either extremely hot or extremely cold, does this. Tea is usually taken too hot, and by rendering the gums diseases, produces caries of the teeth. This is one way in which the mischief I have alluded to, is brought about.
But the teeth are injured through the medium of the stomach. The same membrane which lines the mouth, extends to the stomach and lines it; and whatever instrumentalities affect the latter unfavorably, have a proportional effect upon the former. Among these are hot and cold drinks. So that hot tea has a double agency in producing that species of disease, of which I am now speaking.
One evidence of the tendency of hot drinks to induce caries of the teeth and gums, is derived from an examination of the cows near cities, fed on still slops, and other slops at too high a temperature. When this subject was strongly agitated in New York, a few years since, the teeth of cows on some of the milk farms in that vicinity, were examined, and the results were most striking. In the case of the cow which was fed upon natural food, the teeth were perfectly healthy, and the enamel – the hard substance which coats the tooth wherever it projects beyond the gum – was quite healthy and sound. The portions of the jaw which support the teeth, forming their sockets, called the alveolar process, were also healthy. Nor was there any accumulation of tartar between the teeth; on the contrary, they were firm and white.
But in the cow fed upon still slops, hot from an adjacent distillery, the whiteness of the teeth was gone; in other words, they had lost their enamel. Nor was the decay wholly confined to the enameled part of the teeth, for even the bony part had suffered, as was shown by a general diminution of size. Caries had also commenced, as was evident from the black spots. Indeed the alveolar processes had themselves become diseased; ulcers formed at the roots of the teeth; the portion of the jawbone opposite these roots had become affected and was broken off, and one of the teeth had quite disappeared.
But whatever injures the lining membrane of the stomach to such an extent as to react upon the teeth, must, of course, affect the nerves of this great central organ of the body, and not only produce disease at this point, but also in every organ or part of the system which sympathizes strongly with it. Dyspepsia, nervous or sick headache, heart disease, palsy, and sometimes epilepsy – in truth, every form of nervousness and nervous disease which can be named, may be, at times, the legitimate and certain fruit of tea drinking. Or when these diseases originate in other sources, they are always greatly aggravated by it.
In particular does tea drinking tend to paralytic affections, and to nervous headache. Let not the slave to tea solace herself with the idea that tea cures her headache. It may, it is true, afford temporary relief; it often has done so. But the complaint is always aggravated by it, and the seeds of other diseases are often sown.
Decay of teeth, and disease of the stomach, moreover, are hastened by other causes. It is a well known fact that the teeth, like most other parts of the animal machine, last much better for being used, at least moderately. But they who wash down their food with their tea, masticate less in the same proportion; and consequently have their teeth more subject to decay.
For this very reason, too – that is, from the fact that the food is less perfectly masticated and insalivated – digestion is less perfect. Dr. Arbuthnot says – “Mastication is a very necessary preparation of solid aliment, without which there can be no good digestion.” Solid aliment, well chewed, is moist enough without any addition. When, however, we swallow large quantities of any drink, cold or hot, the absorbents of the stomach are taxed, and its vital energies expended in carrying off the superfluous liquid; so that the process of digestion, being commenced and carried on by a weakened stomach, must necessarily be in the same proportion imperfect. Hence many unpleasant sensations, such as fullness, wind, distention, heat, acidity, and even pain; and hence, too, as the final result, chronic inflammation, schirrhus, cancer, and many more diseases.
Some of the evil effects of tea drinking fall with greatest weight upon females. How many women who think they cannot get along a single day without tea, owe to it their cold feet and hands, their liability to frequent cold, their peculiar difficulties, especially their weakening ones, and their loss of appetite. No wonder tea drinkers are so frequently small eaters, when their tea has gradually destroyed their appetite!
One cause of scrofulous constitution – I mean by inheritance – is to be found in the use of tea by ancestors. Whatever weakens the nerves – especially those of the stomach – in a mother, is sure to entail a tendency to disease on her offspring, which will not infrequently prove to be scrofula or tuberculous consumption.
The senses, or rather the organs of the sense, are sometimes made to suffer from the slow poison of tea; -- especially the organs of vision and taste. The hearing is affected, at least indirectly, by colds, which are more frequent for the use of tea. Sometimes the voice is affected by tea drinking; but this is a less frequent result than any of the former.
It is not, of course, for one moment to be believed, that black tea tens to disease as much as green tea; or tea that is weak, as much as that which is strong. But it is to be believed and maintained, that tea of both kinds, and in every degree of strength, tends to disease in a greater or less degree, because in every form and at every degree of strength, it is more or less poisonous.
-------- o --------
INJURY TO THE INTELLECT.
why tea may be expected to injure the intellect. The customary
opinion considered. Facts and causes. Literary giants.
If tea affects the brain and nerves, and produces not only that state of things which is everywhere known and called by the general term “nervousness,” but also the severer forms of nervous disease; if moreover, it affects those avenues to knowledge, the senses, it is manifest it must affect all those powers and faculties of the mind whose results we call intellect.
I am not ignorant that this beverage is taken by thousands, as a sharpener of the intellect; unaware, wholly so, of its remoter benumbing tendency. But this no more proves its usefulness, than does the confidence of the ignorant in brandy, tobacco, or opium, for the same purpose. On the contrary, the very fact that it increases, at first, the vividness of the sensations, causes a preternatural activity of the ideas, and unlooses the tongue, only serves to raise our suspicions against it. There is no doubt that the mind of every person is made more dull, in the end, by its use.
It is said of one of the giants of our American literature, that after a long season of mental depression, amounting, sometimes, to a fit of hypochondria – induced, no doubt, from former potations – he would suddenly resume his teacups, and accomplish, for a few days, a prodigious amount of mental labor, after which he would sink down, and become again, for a long period, a more hibernating animal. Yet he destroyed himself, prematurely, in this way, in the end. Dr. Johnson, moreover, another giant of literature of another century and country, is believed to have essentially injured his intellectual faculties – if indeed he did not greatly hasten his dissolution – by his excess in tea drinking. Other cases might be cited.
-------- o --------
ITS EFFECT ON MORALS.
drinking leads to intemperance. It
subjects us to the
dominion of our appetite. Is demoralizing by its waste.
Among the thousands who use tea, there are not a few who know it to be a foolish habit, and there are even some who believe it to be absolutely wrong. And yet in spite of their convictions, many there are who will not discontinue it.
I need no stop to prove that a daily indulgence in what we know to be wrong, is of immoral tendency; nor that Christians, and indeed all other people, are under obligation to get rid of every improper or foolish habit, and to do all to the glory of God. It is sufficient to announce the fact, and leave the matter to the conscientiousness of the reader.
A more important step is, to show that the tendency of tea drinking to intemperance, is immoral. Whatever takes away from us the power of self-government, and leaves us the slaves of others or of our own propensities, is of this description, and is therefore wrong.
Some may startle at the intimation that tea drinking leads to intemperance. But such persons should know that whatever keeps up or encourages a morbid or unnatural thirst in the community, exposes to the danger of gratifying that thirst with extra stimulants. Indeed, tea is itself an extra stimulus, and is drank for the sake of the stimulus, whatever some may think to the contrary. He who is in the habit of exciting his nervous system with tea, however slightly – so that he can labor or think the better for it – is already in the path of intemperance, in the strictest sense of the term, and has no guaranty that he shall not advance, in the high road he has entered, to its grosser and more destructive forms.
The tea drinking subjects us, in no trifling degree, to the dominion of the animal appetites, will, I think, hardly be doubted. He who is dependent, for strength of body or mind, to any thing whatever which is a mere excitant of the nervous system, has his spiritual nature, in a degree somewhat in proportion, enslaved to the animal propensities. Such a result is inevitable.
But the tremendous waste which the use of this beverage occasions, to which I have alluded in the first chapter – I mean the mere pecuniary waste – is another evidence of its demoralizing tendency. It is no light thing to spend ten or twelve millions of dollars ever year* on an article which is acknowledge, at best, to be a mere luxury, and not in any ordinary sense of the term, a necessary. It is not only presupposing much callousness of moral feeling, but greatly adds to it. Especially is this true then of a community that boasts of its charities when some of the noblest of those charities – of which, too, we make our boast – do not coast us, nationally, but a quarter of a million. Take, for example, the foreign missionary cause. Is it not passing strange that a Christian community, which with every possible exertion can scarcely be roused to give $250,000 a year for the conversion of the world, will spend more than forty times that sum for its tea? Is not the influence, then, of tea drinking demoralizing?
-------- o --------
THE USUAL DEFENSE OF TEA DRINKERS.
defense. Second – all things said to be poisonous. Tea invigorating.
Nourishing. Plea of experience. Experiments of Dr. Beaumont.
Stomach “accommodating.” Defense of obstinacy .
Some will say – “But suppose it were granted that tea is a medicine – a point which you have labored long and hard to prove – what is this against its use? Has not the tomato been recommended by physicians and others for this very reason, that it has medical properties? Is it not so with the onion? Still more; are not more of all our condiments – mustard, pepper, spice, saleratus, ginger, cinnamon, and even salt and vinegar – in themselves medicines?
I do not deny that the substances here mentioned are either medicines, or contain medicinal properties; but I cannot admit the justness of the inference which is made. For however healthy mankind are in the use of those substances with their meals, they would certainly be more healthy without them. Medicine, properly speaking, is a foreign substance; a foe to the powers of life. It has no natural affinity to the stomach, nor to any proper articles of food or drink which are received into it. This is true, whether in the form of calomel, opium, alcohol, mustard or pepper; and in the smallest as well as the largest quantity. It is true of the small quantity of medicine found in tomatoes, onions and tea. They are not the better as food or drink for possessing medical properties; but the worse. Medicine and food are, in their action and effects, wholly incompatible with each other.
“But you have said,” I shall also be told, “that tea of all kinds is more or less poisonous. Now what is that to him who uses it? All things we eat or drink contain poison, more or less, or they would probably do us no good.”
This defense of tea is more lame than the former. For, in the first place, it is not true that poison is necessary to our support, as some ignorantly maintain. Nor is it even true that all things contain it that we eat. Not one of the farinaceous grains contains poison – a particle of it – in any ordinary circumstances. Ergot, a strong poison, is indeed occasionally found in rye, but its appearance is only occasional. The same may be said of a few other poisons which find their way into our grains. But pure, healthy grain, I say again, has no poison in it. Nor have apples, pears, melons, currants, strawberries and other common fruits; with potatoes, beets, etc. and peas and beans.
Is it asked how then we can obtain the poison of alcohol from them? I answer, by a chemical change, viz., fermentation. Whatever contains saccharine or sugary matter can be made to ferment; and fermentation produces – I might almost say creates – alcohol. So the separation of plaster of Paris, by a chemical process, results in oil of vitriol and quick lime, two rank poisons; but who will say there is any vitriol or lime in the plaster? One might eat a quart of it, if the stomach could hold so much, and not be poisoned, in the slightest degree. Let this, then, be a sufficient reply to the charge that all things contain poison.
I know, indeed, that many things which are not poisonous, can be made to destroy. Thus cold water which, if pure, never has a particle of poison in it, if taken excessively cold when the system is over-heated or over-fatigued, or otherwise disabled, may destroy, sometimes almost instantly. A surfeit may be produced, and a crop of eruptions on the inner surface of the stomach, by merely overloading it with apples or bread. But there is no poisoning, properly speaking in either case. A poison is a substance which, in every quantity, however, small, and in all circumstances of health, has a destructive tendency on the powers of life, or is anti-vital. Such is the case with alcohol, opium, calomel, prussic acid, tobacco, tea, and, as I shall show in another place, coffee; and in truth all things which are properly medicinal.
It is said, perhaps, that if tea contains poison at all, it is in such small quantity, as to render it harmless. But it remains to be proved that poison ceases to be poison, because minutely divided. Indeed, there are not wanting facts which lead us to suspect the reverse to be true, so far as its application to the living system is concerned. It was known before the days of the homoeopathists, that very small doses of active medicine, frequently repeated, such as calomel, digitalis, and opium, by insinuating themselves into all parts of the system, poison it, or in other words, produce their specific effects, in a greater degree, in proportion to the whole quantity given, than larger doses. Can it be that tea is an exception to the general law?
“But it is invigorating, and we need some stimulus or other. I should faint without my tea; especially when my labor is severe.”
So says the spirit drinker, too; the tobacco chewer and smoker; the snuff and opium taker; and for aught I can see, with the same show of reason. All claim the need of stimulus, by which they mean a stimulus to the nerves; and all claim that their favorite stimulus gives them strength.
That no one can be sustained without stimuli of some sort, it certainly true. The air which is the food of the lungs, the light which may be regarded as in some sort the food of the eye, and all other things which excite or move to healthy action any part of the human system, are stimulants. In general, however, when in common conversation we speak of stimulants or stimuli, as applicable to the human system, we mean those things which excite or irritate the nervous extremities, whether on the external or the internal surface of the body. But these do not give us permanent strength. The aid they afford us is deceptive. They make us stronger and more active, and perhaps warmer for a time; but as soon as their strength, usually of very short duration, comes to be exhausted there is a falling away or loss of strength fully equal to, and it is believed somewhat greater than the previous exaltation. Tea, then, though it gives us strength leaves us, when its strength is gone, in a worse condition than it found us.
That the fainting sensation is purely nervous, and by no means the necessary result of a want of proper food, is shown by the first case cited by Mr. Cole, as well as by the general fact, that a little spirits, opium, wine, or even cider, as well as tea or coffee, will remove it, and that almost instantly; whereas it takes a considerable time, for food to be brought to a condition in which it can give the strength.
“But is it true, then, that tea contains no nourishment?”
Not a particle, in itself considered. Water, which by the way makes up the far greater part of the liquid we call tea, is only nutritive, (at least in ordinary circumstances,) in this sense, that it dilutes the blood, and by producing a more healthy state of this fluid, renders it the more fit for the process of assimilation.
I grant, indeed, that as it is usually taken, that is, with milk or cream and sugar, it contains a little nutriment though even here it might justly be said that a small piece of bread or a small quantity of fruit, would contain more. Why should we drink twelve or twenty or thirty ounces of fluid, to get less than half an ounce of solid nutriment? But we may be assured that this apology is mere pretense; and that it is the nervous excitement which is sought, in tea drinking.
Still it will be said by some, that they are confident, in spite of all our reasoning, tea does them no harm. Is not experience, they will say, the safest guide – the best school-master?
I have no wish to set aside experience; on the contrary, we should always endeavor to make the most of it. But there is a false experience, as well as a true; and we should seek and cleave to the latter. Where a thing produces immediate pain and disturbance in the stomach or elsewhere, it is generally best to let it alone. But it often happens that many things injure us which common observation would not detect, at once; and we are forced to correct our own experience by the observation or study of that of others.
The following statement and facts will illustrate, in a most striking manner this part of our subject.
Alexis St. Martin had his left side so wounded as to leave, on recovery, an external opening, an inch or more in diameter, through which could be seen, when the bandage and compress which he usually wore, were removed, the exact condition, and to some extent, the operations of the stomach. In these circumstances, Dr. Beaumont instituted a series of experiments on the nature and effects of the gastric juice, in the progress of which he made many curious discoveries.
One of these was, that the lining membrane of the stomach might be so inflamed and broken out, and filled with eruptions and ulcerations, as not only to secrete pus, but to bleed, without the subject of so much disease being conscious of the least suffering, and without his health being in any way affected “in any sensible degree.” This condition of the stomach, without any consciousness of the fact on the part of the possessor, was quite frequent; and though more generally the consequence of improper indulgence in eating or drinking, was also induced by a more moderated use of spirits, wine, beer, or any intoxicating liquor, when continued for some days. “Eating voraciously, or to excess,” says Dr. Beaumont; “swallowing food coarsely masticated, or too fast; the introduction of solid pieces of meat suspended by cords into the stomach, or of muslin bags of aliment secured in the same way, almost invariably produce similar effects, if repeated a number of times in close succession.” “Extensive active or chronic disease may exist,” he adds, “in the membranous tissues of the stomach and bowels, more frequently than has generally been believed. In the case of the subject of these experiments inflammation certainly does exist to a considerable extent, even in an apparent state of health.
Now suppose St. Martin, relying on his sensations alone, were to insist that eating too fast, swallowing unmasticated food, or the use of beer, cider, wine, tea or coffee, did not hurt him, while the observations of Dr. Beaumont told a different story, ought we to believe him? He certainly would speak from experience. Is he to be believed, or shall his experience be corrected by the observations of Dr. Beaumont?
I have found many individuals whose experience told them they could not digest their dinner till they had taken a cud of tobacco into their mouths; and one or two, till they had swallowed some of the juice. Should this experience be regarded as true, or should it be deemed false experience, and as such be corrected?
Others still are to be found – in great numbers, too – who believe their experience proves the necessity, at least in their own case, of using opium or brandy. They can do more work, and do it better, they say; why then is it not best for them? But how long can they do more work, and do it better? How long before they must increase the quantity of their stimulus, or else be found falling off? And how many other diseases are they meanwhile sowing the seeds of – preparatory to a future harvest of suffering.
“The stomach,” we are told, “is a very accommodating, and habit very powerful.” I grant the force of habit, and the accommodating power of the stomach. I grant even the whole truth of the story of Mithridates, king of Pontus – that he accustomed himself to the deadly influence of hemlock. But what then? Was Mithridates uninjured by it? Did it produce no inflammation of the lining membrane of his stomach and alimentary canal? Was it neither the cause nor the aggravation of disease? If it is said he lived to be about seventy years of age, I reply, that I have known confirmed drunkards at a still greater age, and also confirmed opium takers; men who began their intemperate lives much earlier than Mithridates began his hemlock. Does their narrow escape, when thousands for one of them have fallen, prove their rum, and opium, and hemlock, safe, much less useful? Yet on the principle of being guided by our own experience solely, such might be the conclusion. Such, in fact, is the practical conclusion of all who cite Mithridates to prove that the stomach is “accommodating,” without any evil consequences following from this accommodation.
For, in the first place, the stomach is, without doubt, diseased; and this state of things, besides being unpleasant and undesirable in itself, as a general rule, predisposes to other diseases, and renders all other maladies which sent in more severe than they naturally would be, and more likely to be fatal. Secondly, if owing to a strong natural constitution, the individual should last to a comparative old age, yet he will never last as long as he would have lasted had he avoided the poison. But suppose, in the third place, this were possible, his posterity, should any follow, would inevitably inherit disease as the consequence; and if otherwise, his example would influence those whose posterity would be visited in the same way. There is no discharge in this war. All accommodations of the stomach, or indeed of any other part or organ, are made at the future expense of the system, or are to be paid for, with interest, by posterity.
“But is there not a difference of constitution? Is not one man’s meat another’s poison?” Not in the sense commonly received. There is a difference of constitution among men, just as there is among horses or cattle, but no greater. The human constitution, in its unperverted state, is one, as much as the horse constitution is one. And, as a general rule, the food or drink which is best for one person, is best for another, unless custom has so changed him, that second nature is stronger than first nature. Men endure tobacco, and run, and tea, and hemlock, and many even become fond of them, just as cows come to feed on fish, cats on bread, and dogs on tobacco.
“But I feel so lost without tea,” others complainingly tell us, “that I cannot feel I have had a breakfast without it.” And not a few housekeepers have a similar, or rather a still greater difficulty in preparing a table without it. All this, however, may be got over in time, and only shows the great power of habit.
“Well, after al, I like a short life and a merry one,” I have heard people say. “I have no notion of denying myself one of the comforts of life, for the sake of five or ten more wretched years at the ends of it.” But a part of the mistake here is, that in adding ten years to life, it is not al added to the end. The middle is prolonged in the same proportion with the rest. And as to a merry life, it so happens, though the declaration may not be accredited, that the longest and healthiest life is the most merry, despite of its self-denials.
Lastly, it will be said by a few, that they “would continue the use of tea, if they knew it injured them.” They love it, and will have it, at every hazard of soul and body. “It is nobody’s business,” they add, “but their own.”
But is this so? Are you not a member of society? And do you not violate a duty you owe to society, when you pursue a course of conduct which unfits you, in the least degree, for usefulness? Has your example no influence? And have you a right to set a bad example, even though the evil you thereby confirm were but small? Should you do thus, would you regard yourself a good citizen; and ought you to be regarded as such by others?
Have you no relative duties to perform? Have you no father, mother, brother, sister, son or daughter, who may need your wasted earnings – to say nothing of wasted vital energies – provided you never should? Can you, with clear conscience, waste that time or money – and time itself is money – which, if not wanted in the education of your children, may be wanted by them or by some of your other friends hereafter? Besides, are there no deeds of charity to be done in the world?
It may not be well to appeal too frequently to the Christian professions and Christian principles of the tea drinker; for in a few instances he may disclaim them. Generally speaking, however, tea drinkers profess a belief in Christianity. They admit the authority of Paul and his contemporaries and coadjutors. Yet these writers tell us, “No man liveth to himself, and no man dieth to himself;” and that we should glorify God in our body and spirit which are alike his.
Part II. – COFFEE.
ORIGIN OF THE USE OF COFFEE.
encomium on coffee. Its origin. Opposition to it.
Gradual progress. Introduction into Europe. Opposition it met with there.
Present consumption. Rapid increase in its use.
“O COFFEE! Thou dispellest the cares of the great; thou bringest back those who wander from the paths of knowledge. Coffee is the very beverage of the people of God, and the cordial of his servants who thirst for wisdom. When coffee is infused into the bowl, it exhales the odor of musk, and is of the color of ink. The truth is not known except to the wise who drink it from the foaming coffee cup. God has deprived fools of coffee, who with invincible obstinacy condemn its use as injurious.
“Coffee is our gold, and in the place of its libations we are in the enjoyment of the best and noblest society. Coffee is even as innocent a drink as the purest milk, from which it is only distinguished by its color. Tarry with thy coffee in the place of its preparation and the good God will hover over thee and participate in his feast. There the graces of the saloon, the luxury of life, the society of friends, all furnish a picture of the abode of happiness.
“Every care vanished when the cup bearer presents thee the delicious chalice. It will circulate fleetly through thy veins, and will not rankle there: if though doubtest this, contemplate the youth and the beauty of those who drink it. Grief cannot exist where it grows; sorrow humbles itself in obedience before its powers.
“Coffee is the drink of God’s people; in it is health. Let this be the answer to those who doubt its qualities. In it will we drown our adversities, and in its fire consume our sorrows. Whoever has once seen the blissful chalice, will scorn the wine cup. Glorious drink! Thy color is the seal of purity, and reason proclaims it genuine. Drink with confidence, and regard not the prattle of fools, who condemn without foundation.”
The foregoing encomium, or rather tirade, on the virtues of coffee, was taken by the Transylvania Journal of Medicine from a German Journal for 1834; for which it is said to have been translated from the Arabic of Sheik Abdal-Kader Anasari Djezeri Haubali, son of Mohammed. Of its extravagance we shall be better able to judge by and by.
Coffee was introduced into Europe and America as a common drink, much later than tea. It was indeed brought there more than two centuries ago; but it is only one hundred and seventy-one years since the first coffee house was opened. This was in Paris.
Coffee is a native of Abyssinia. From thence it found its way into Arabia, in the sixth century – probably as a substitute for wine, when that liquor was first prohibited by the Koran. It appears, however, to have been, for some time, used as a medicine rather than as a common beverage, for it was not till near the close of the fifteenth century that it became a frequent favorite, even in Arabia. In 1511 its use had extended to Cairo.
Opposition to it was, however, soon excited, and a sentence of public condemnation pronounced against it, at Mecca, by an assembly of maftis, lawyers and physicians. They declared coffee drinking to be contrary to the law of their prophet, and alike injurious to soul and body. Soon the pulpits at Cairo resounded with anathemas; all the stores or magazines of the seditious berry were burnt; the saloons were shut, and their keepers pelted with the fragments of their broken pots and cups. The tumult, however, soon subsided, for the Sultan, by a public decree, declared coffee drinking not to be heresy; and the two principle physicians who had pronounced it to be pernicious to health, he caused to be executed.
From Cairo this suspicious liquor passed to Damascus and Aleppo; and thence, in 1554, to Constantinople. Here, as at Cairo, it was opposed by the dervishes and others, who regarded its use as prohibited by the prophet. They called it, when roasted, a species of charcoal; and declaimed, with much vehemence, against the impiety of using so base an article at the table.
Coffee appears to have been first introduced into Italy in 1615; and afterwards, in 1657, to France; in both instances, however, as a curiosity. It was evidently beginning to be used at Marseilles in 1679; for during that year, the medical faculty, in that city, made it the them of a public disputation.
It has been already seen that the first coffee house in Europe was opened in Paris, in 1672. the coffee was first sold at 2s. 6d. a cup. The shop-keeper being unsuccessful at Paris, afterward removed to London.
Here the new drink was destined to meet with a more powerful opposition than in Asia or Africa. Ministers aw well as other declaimed against it, some of them with much violence. Probably it was seen to be used chiefly, if not wholly, for the sake of its nervous excitement. The following is said to be an extract from one of the sermons of those days, against the votaries of coffee and tobacco. It is inserted as a curiosity, rather than with approbation of its denunciatory spirit.
“They cannot wait till the smoke of the infernal regions surrounds them, but encompass themselves with smoke of their own accord, and drink a poison which God made black that it might bear the devil’s own color.”
Coffee, however, like spirits, tobacco, opium, and other excitants – in a world were men are governed by appetite rather than by reason – was destined to have a run, and a prodigious run too. For one hundred and fifty years its use has been extending; and it is now found in nearly all parts of the civilized globe.
The exact amount used in the whole world – indeed in any part of it – cannot be exactly ascertained. The quantity imported into England, for the year 1832, was within a fraction of 50,000,000 pounds, but it is supposed that about half of it was re-exported. In 1840, the quantity consumed in the countries of Europe annually was estimated as follows: -- France, including Spain, Italy, etc., about 70,000,000 pounds; Netherlands and Holland, 81,000,000; Germany, and the countries round the Baltic, 64,000,000.
The consumption of coffee in the United States has been rapidly increasing for many years. In 1821, the importation was only 21,273,653 pounds; whereas in 1836, fifteen years afterward, the amount was 93,790,507, and the actual consumption nearly as great. During the seven years ending in 1838, the consumption increased one hundred per cent, while the population itself advanced only thirty-three per cent.
-------- o --------
COFFEE A NARCOTIC, OR POISON.
Testimony in regard to the properties of coffee. Dr. Hooper – Dr. Paris – Dr. Willich –
Dr. Beaumont – Mr. Graham – Prof. Hitchcock – Dr. Trotter – Dr. Dunglison –
Dr. Bell – Dr. Combe – Prof. Sweetser – Dr. Shurtleff – Londe – Sinibaldi –
Linnaeus – Drs. Perciva, Musgrave and Millington – Dr. Grindal –
The Encyclopedia Americana – Dr. Burdell – Mr. Cole – Dr. Hahnemann.
That coffee is essentially and properly a medicine – a narcotic – will hardly be questioned by any medical man of the present day; nor indeed by any individual who has paid but the smallest attention to its effects on the human system. It may be well, however, to cite a few of the more respectable testimonials.
Hooper, in his Medical Dictionary, says – “It possesses nervine and astringent qualities.” “It is said to be a good antidote at use against an over-dose of opium, and to relieve obstinate spasmodic asthmas.” – A substance, by the way, which is a nervine, and has the power of relieving spasm, is of course a narcotic, or diffusible stimulant.
Dr. Paris says – “It is suspected of producing palsies – and not without foundation.” – Here one might be disposed to ask – Do we want a stronger reason for believing coffee to be a narcotic, than the fact of its producing palsy?
Dr. Willich presents coffee as possessing “anti-spasmodic virtues,” and speaks, in particular, of its powerful effect on the nervous system. He says it is a “valuable medicine.”
The opinion of Dr. Beaumont has been given in speaking of tea. In remarking on the necessity which exists of increasing the dose of both tea and coffee, in order to have their effects permanent, he says of the additional quantity – “Yet this is only an addition to the strength of the narcotic he is in the constant habit of using.”
I have also noticed, briefly, the opinion of Mr. Graham, who assures us that both “tea and coffee are among the most powerful poisons of the vegetable kingdom.”
Professor Hitchcock, in his “Dyspepsia Forestalled,” repeatedly speaks of coffee as a narcotic. “The bewitching influence,” he says of both tea and coffee, “lies in their narcotic properties – the same principle that gives opium and tobacco their attractions. They exhilarate the system, producing a pleasurable glow, and lessening nervous irritability. They do this in a less degree than ardent spirit and wine; still the exciting principle is essentially the same.”
Dr. Trotter, in speaking of the cause of nervous maladies, says that “the only means of cure lie in a total abstinence from every species of fermented liquor, and from every thing that bears any analogy to them, such as tea, coffee, opium, and all other narcotics.”
Dr. Dunglison says of coffee – “It is manifestly tonic, and somewhat stimulating;” and in many of his occasional remarks, clearly admits its narcotic tendency.
The same admission is made in the Journal of Health, in Faust’s Catechism of Health, and in the Catechism of Health by Dr. Bell, of Philadelphia. All this is good authority. The latter work says expressly that coffee – not strong coffee, merely, but coffee in all circumstances – has a “pernicious effect upon the stomach, bowels, and nervous system generally.”
The testimony of Dr. Combe, in his work on Diet and Regimen, is very much in point. He says – “It acts as a strong stimulant, and certainly increases our comfort for the time. Like all other stimulants, however, its use is attended with the disadvantage of exhausting the sensibility of the part on which it acts, and inducing weakness. This inconvenience is not felt to the same extent, indeed, after coffee, as after spirits, but still it exists.”
Professor Sweetser says – “It has appeared to me that even more persons suffer disturbance of the nervous system and of the digestive function from the free use of coffee, than of tea.” Elsewhere he avows the belief that its long continued use sometimes produces palsies.
Dr. S. A. Shurtleff, a physician of Boston, says – “Of all the common beverages drank in society, coffee is decidedly the worst.”
Londe, a distinguished French writer in health, classes coffee among the drinks which stimulate, but do not nourish. He says – “it accelerates the functions only by shortening their duration. It doubles the energy of the organs only by doubling the debility which follows.” ”Coffee,” he adds, “should be used only in those circumstances in which it is proper to use fermented or spirituous liquors. It is not on account of its liquid condition, or its high temperature, but on account of its stimulating without nourishing, that coffee, like tea, produces nervous affections.”
Sinibaldi, an Italian medical writer of some eminence, has the following remarks – “The commerce which we have opened with Asia and the new world, in addition to the small pox and other diseases, has brought us a new drink, which has contributed most shockingly to the destruction of our constitutions – I mean coffee. It produces debility, alters the gastric juice, disorders digestion, and often produces convulsions, palsy of the limbs, and vertigo.”
Linnaeus, in his “Medical Botanical System,” represents coffee as being “drying, healing, expelling, carminative, diuretic, exciting, anti-venereal and anthelmintic.” He speaks of it, moreover, complaints, at the head of which list stand hypochondriasis and hysteria. Surely if such powers do not entitle it to the name of a medicine – a narcotic poison too – I known not what could.
Drs. Percival, Musgrave and Millengen, recommend coffee in cases of asthma; and the latter, in speaking of its medicinal effects, says, it is liable to produce feverish heat, anxiety, palpitations, trembling, weakness of sight, and predisposition to apoplexy.
Dr. Grindal, of Russia, in his attendance at the hospital at Dorpat, has used a preparation of raw coffee in intermittent fevers, as a substitute for Peruvian Bark, with great success. In eighty cases, scarcely one resisted its power.
The Encyclopedia Americana, in an article which was probably written by Dr. Lieber, one of the editors, says – “As a medicine, strong coffee is a powerful stimulant and cordial; and in paroxysms of the asthma, is one of the best remedies; but it should be very strong.”
Dr. Burdell, of New York, has made many curious experiments on small animals, not only with the decoction of tea, but with what he calls the extract of coffee. He says – “By experiments upon animals, it is shown that there is more excitement of the nervous system produced by coffee than by tea; but death does not ensue as quickly.”
The testimony of Mr. Cole should not be forgotten. That learned surgeon believed coffee to be liable to bring on all the diseased action which he referred to tea; so that in his view there is really a coffee disease abroad, as well as a tea disease; or rather, according to him coffee and tea produce symptoms nearly the same. On this point I shall say more presently.
Dr. Hahnemann, the father of the homeopathic system of medicine, and the author of an essay on coffee, gives the following testimony: -- “Coffee is strictly a medicinal substance. All medicines, in strong doses, have a disagreeable effect on the feelings of a health person. No one ever failed to be disgusted the first time he smoked tobacco. No healthy palate ever found strong coffee, without sugar, palatable on the first trial.
-------- o --------
DISEASES PRODUCED BY COFFEE.
The coffee disease. Opinions of Hahnemann. Other diseases
excited by coffee.
No man has written better on the diseases induced by coffee, than Hahnemann. Whatever may become of his system of medicine, his essay on coffee will endure as long as the English language.
He first describes what may be called, as has been intimated in the preceding chapter, the coffee disease: -- which, however, did differ somewhat from the “tea disease” of Mr. Cole, as will be readily seen.
“The first effect of coffee, says Hahnemann, “is in general, a more or less agreeable increase of the vital activity. The animal, the natural and the vital functions, as they are called, are for some hours, at first, artificially elevated by it; and the subsequent effect which arises after the lapse of several hours, it its opposite – an unpleasant feeling of existence, a lower degree of vitality, a kind of paralysis of the animal and vital functions.
“When a person unaccustomed to coffee, drinks a moderate quantity of it, or one accustomed to it, an immoderate quantity, his individuality, the sensation of his existence, of his vitality, is, for the several next succeeding hours, more lively. His pulse beats fuller, quicker, but softer. He acquires a well defined glow in the cheek – a glow which does not disappear insensibly in the adjacent parts, but stands our separate like a spot of red. The forehead and the palm of the hand become moist and warm. He feels warmer than before; he feels an agreeably oppressive warmth, a sort of voluptuous palpitation of the heart ensues, as when great joy is felt. The veins of the hands are distended. Externally, too, a greater than the natural warmth is produced, which, however, a large quantity of coffee never changes to heat, (rather, to general perspiration;) some even acquire a burning heat by its use. His presence of mind, his faculty of attention and sympathy, are more lively than in the healthy natural condition.
“If the dose is immoderately large, and the subject peculiarly irritable and quite unaccustomed to its use, it produces a headache affecting one side of the head, from the upper part of the side bone (os parietal) to the base of the brain. The membrane covering the brain seems to partake of its influence on the affected side, and to become painfully sensitive. The hands and feet become cold; there is a cold sweat on the forehead and in the palms of the hands. The temper is extremely irritable and intolerant; no kindness awakens gratitude. The patient is anxious and trembling, much disquieted, weeps without any occasion, or laughs involuntarily. After a few hours he slumbers, awakening from time to time, as if much frightened.”
Dr. Hahnemann goes on to explain the nature of fatigue, hunger, thirst, and digestion, and to show that coffee removes the first three of these, and greatly impairs the latter. But this is not all, as it appears. The intestinal action is quickened, and the half-digested food is hurried through the body in a half-liquid state, without having contributed much of its nutritive substance to the support of the body. The lower portion of the bowels is not only over-stimulated, but disordered in its function.
This is the first stage of the coffee disease; and were there no secondary stage it would hardly be regarded as formidable. But to this over-activity of the whole system which I have partially described, succeeds a condition of things almost the reverse. Intestinal motion is more difficult and often painful, muscular motion generally irksome, the extremities chilly, ill humor is excited, a sort of gnawing hunger comes on, and there is more or less of oppression of the head and stomach. The disease, in this secondary stage, and in those who are constitutionally irritable, would become serious, were it not partially removed, in due time, by a renewal of the coffee.
But other diseases, such as the individual is predisposed to, are also excited. Such are nervous or sick headache, toothache, darting pains in the body, spasms in the chest, stomach and abdomen, costiveness, erysipelas, diseases of the liver, uterus and bones. The latter become carious, sometimes exceedingly so. Nothing but grief and the used of mercury is so destructive to the teeth. In children, a species of hectic fever is induced; and short of this, inflammation of the eyes, with difficulty breathing and bowel affections. Even when no excited by coffee, these diseases and most others are aggravated by it.
It is strange that the daily use of that which is admitted on all hands to be an active medicine, should produce such mischief? Let us consider, then, how incompatible in their action and effects medicine and food are, even when taken apart from each other. But if the frequent use of medicine, when not taken with meals, is destructive, how much greater must be the disturbance and final derangement when it is actually present in the stomach with our food from day to day, and from year to year! *
I have alluded to darting or lancinating pains in the body, as one occasional effect of coffee drinking. But these are sometimes regarded as a part of the true coffee disease, before described; this symptom is represented as extremely troublesome. When it occurs in the limbs, it does not appear to be in the joints, but in the spaces between the joints – rather in the cellular tissue or flesh than in the bones. It is a curious affection, and has been notices by very few writers.
The expressions moderate and immoderate, as used above, must of course be understood relatively; for as one person, say a robust laborer, can bear more than another, what would be but moderate for one, would be immoderate in the case of another. A certain prince whom Hahnemann mentions, used, at one, the strength of seven ounces of well burnt and suitably prepared coffee, while some persons require only a quarter of an ounce.
-------- o --------
MORAL AND INTELLECTUAL TENDENCES.
on this subject. Mental injury induced. Its effects
in Germany. Immorality of the waste by coffee.
“When I awake,” says a devotee of coffee, who was once respectable in intellectual and moral powers, “I have the intelligence and activity of an oyster.” But without intimating that coffee drinkers are greatly, generally, lowered in the scale of creation, it is nevertheless asserted, and may be maintained, that coffee it a stultifier of the mental faculties; and that notwithstanding its deceptive promises at first, no person, young or old, ever escaped its influence in this respect.
But if the mind could escape, in the general attack upon the nervous energies of the system, not so with the moral faculties. These are crippled, dwarfed, I had almost said annihilated. If we try to exercise them, the effort seems almost without hope.
This result, however, is the secondary effect of the coffee, and not the primary. For as Hahnemann well says, the primary operation of coffee is to excite the sexual passion, and develop it many years too early – he says ten or fifteen – a circumstance which has a most visible effect on the public morals; one too which is as sad as it is visible.
“Immediately after our coffee,” says the same ingenious writer, “the stores of memory leap, so to speak, to our tongues; and talkativeness, haste, and the letting slip something we should not have mentioned, are often the consequence. Moderation and prudence are wholly wanting. The cold reflective seriousness of our forefathers, the solid firmness of their will, resolutions and judgment, the duration of their not speedy, but powerful and judicious bodily movement – all this noble, original impress of our nature disappears before this medicinal very beverage, and gives way to over-hasty attempts, rash resolutions, immature decisions, levity and fickleness, talkativeness, inconstancy, rapid mobility of the muscles,” etc.
“I am aware that the German must drink coffee, if he would revel in pleasantry, if he would weave together flimsy romances, and produce frothy jeus d’espirt: and the German female needs coffee, if she would be brilliant and sentimental in modish circles. The ballet dancer, the improvisatore, the mountebank, needs coffee, as does also the fashionable musical virtuoso for his dizzy rapidity, and the omnipresent fashionable physician, when he wishes to flutter through ninety-nine visits of a morning. Let us leave these to their unnatural stimulus; and with it, its consequences on human health and happiness!
“Thus much at least is certain – the most refined man of the world, the most accomplished prodigal of life from one end of the globe to the other, can discover no medical article but coffee (perhaps tea) which is capable of converting our usual sensations for some hours into purely pleasing ones; of producing in us, for some hours, a more jovial, nay even petulant mirth, a more lively wit, a brilliant fancy which goes beyond our temperament – of accelerating the motion of our muscles till they tremble, and of doubling in speed the regular quiet course of our organs of digestion and evacuation; of keeping the sexual appetite in an almost involuntary excitement; of stilling the beneficent pain of hunger and thirst; of driving refreshing sleep from the weary limbs, and of feigning a species of wakefulness at a time when the whole created world of our hemisphere is enjoying is appointed destiny, refreshing rest, in the still bosom of night.”
There may be some peculiarities in the Germans; yet, after all, what can be more obvious, than that a substance which produces the effects here ascribed to it in Germany, must have an unfavorable tendency on intellect and morals in America?
I might dwell, as in speaking of tea, on the immorality of the amazing waste which the use of coffee involves. It might say something of the folly of complaining of heavy taxes, hard times, etc. while we tax ourselves, as a nation, at the rate of about $12,000,000* a year, or $360,000,000 in thirty years. It is no light thing for each individual – man, woman and child – to expend sixty-seven cents a year, or twenty dollars in thirty years. Yet such is the average expenditure for this single article of what is called luxury. In a township of 2,000 inhabitants, it is $1,333 a year; in one of 4,000, it is $2,666; in our own commonwealth it is about half a million. The connection of this extravagance and waste with the idleness, and consequently with the morals of the community, cannot but be obvious.
-------- o --------
WHO ARE INJURED BY COFFEE.
Effects of coffee on children. Its effects on females.
Sufferings of sedentary men.
Coffee, like tea, injures children most; and the more so, the younger they are, and the more tender. Very seldom indeed do we find caries in children from any other cause than coffee. The ulcers connected with these decayed or mortified bones, are exceedingly troublesome, as well as ugly in appearance. They are surrounded by a blue red hard swelling, quite painful, and discharging a gaseous substance.
Though coffee does not appear to produce rickets, it hastens the effects of other causes, and especially induces a species of hectic fever, sometimes called the children’s hectic; or where the cause is well understood, the coffee hectic. Their countenances fade, and their flesh becomes soft. Their speech is feeble or stammering; and when they have learned to walk – in which they are slow – their gait is unsteady and tottering. Their appetite is feeble and seldom good, and sometimes they do not grow. They are apt to be timid, gloomy and discontented, and to sleep but poorly. Dentition with them is often difficult, and always slow. They are also troubled with sore eyes.
This last affection, with some others, especially a rattling of the breast, attacks, says Hahnemann, even nursing infants, provided the mother drinks much coffee, and breathes bad air. How wide-spreading, he exclaims, and how penetrating, must the injurious effects of this beverage be, when even the sucking child suffers from it!
Females suffer most, next to children and infants, from the use of this narcotic. Especially is this true of nervous females, with whom the present age and our own country so much abound, and of these, above all others, who derive from inheritance or wrong habits, a tendency to hysteria, scrofula or consumption. Let such persons – and these are often the very persons who cling to coffee as with a death grasp – let such, I say, beware!
But sedentary men, of every description and age, especially studious men, as well as females and children, suffer greatly both from tea and coffee, and ought not to touch either; nor indeed any of the other hot beverages so much in use – chocolate, shells, etc.
Let me not, in the foregoing remarks, be misunderstood. I am not for granting indulgences to any individual, under any circumstances. Coffee, like tea, is a slow poison to all, under all circumstances. If the robust and those whose employments and habits are most healthy, endure it best, it is simply because they would endure better any other abuse. Besides, the same vital energies which enable them to bear up better under abuses, if properly husbanded, would greatly add to their years, their usefulness and their happiness.
-------- o --------
DEFENSE OF COFFEE DRINKING.
that man in an artificial state needs coffee.
this plea. The notion of its harmlessness considered. Small errors.
The arguments usually brought in defense of coffee drinking, are substantially the same with those which are so frequent in the mouths of tea drinkers. If I have been successful, under the proper head, of showing their fallacy, it is hardly necessary that they should be repeated in this place. There are, however, a few points on which it may be well to bestow a passing notice.
Man, we are told by some, is in an artificial and not a natural state; or rather, to express the idea better, his whole nature, modified by that mixture of error and truth which goes under the soft name of civilization, of the softer one of refinement, has become artificial. In this condition, with an artificial stomach and an artificial digestion, may not artificial drinks become, at times, necessary?
Such is, in substance, the reasoning of a writer in one of our medical journals, whose views still meet with a hearty response from many professional and non-professional men, especially when they are fond of some one or more of these drinks. It happens, moreover, that in particularizing, every one defends the kind of drink to which he is enslaved; while he does not hesitate, so to save his own “orthodoxy” in general, to utter is maledictions against some other member of the fraternity.
“Tea and coffee,” says the writer above referred to, “are employed almost solely as condiments, by means of which we are enabled to take bread and butter and other food with much greater facility and relish, than we otherwise could do, if we only diluted them with water. These, with beer, cider, claret and other kinds of wine, are more used by the temperate, for condiments, than for any other purpose. Our habits are such, that many dishes cannot be comfortably eaten, and if eaten, will disturb the stomach, without them. Many a stomach cannot digest a piece of cake, unless it is followed by a glass of wine, cider or beer. Roast pork, and several other kinds of animal food, not only relish better, but sit much more easily on the stomach by these means. Many fruits cannot be eaten in any quantity, unless they are followed by some such condiment. There seems to be a kind of fitness, a sort of balance, between several articles and made dishes of food, for each other.”
But it is a just inference, that because with the aid of exciting drinks the stomach can digest many things which it cannot digest without them, therefore it is proper to use them? Did the Creator make the stomach so that it cannot do its work till it is goaded and spurred? It cannot be so, in the nature of things. No other condiment can be necessary to the healthy – and with the sick, in these remarks, I have nothing to do – than a good appetite, with a natural and healthful secretion of saliva and the gastric juice.
If Hahnemann is right in saying that coffee hurries the food through the alimentary canal, dissolved, indeed, but only half-digested – and that he is so, no one, I think, who duly considers the subject, will doubt – then all which our champion of tea and coffee has said about their usefulness in aiding digestion, falls to the ground. The most which can justly be affirmed it, that the various processes whose united results constitute digestion, are quickened by these drinks. The gastric juice flows in greater abundance; the liver forms its secretion more rapidly; the lacteals convey chyle faster, and the action of the intestinal canal is more violent. But the nervous energy which is expended in enabling all the vital machinery to work faster than is natural, but which should have been reserved for some future exigency or want, being expended prematurely, a lack of energy in the same proportion follows. So that nothing is gained in real strength to the current of life; besides the flow of that current is unnatural, now too high, now too low; and life’s purposes are not so well accomplished as if the stream were equable in its movements.
Nor is it in the stomach and alimentary canal alone, that mischief is done by such irregularity. It is a law of the system, that if one member suffer, all the members suffer with it. Let us, at the risk of a little repetition, apply this doctrine in the case before us; -- I mean to the use of and the effects of coffee and tea.
These beverages at first, then, increase the gastric and peristaltic action, and by consequence and the action of the parts in immediate contact and connection. But by the law of which I am speaking – commonly called the law of sympathy – other and more distant parts have their action also increases, such as the heart, lungs, brain and skin. Then, when the debility or loss of action comes, as the necessary consequence – when the liver, for example, which before formed its bile too rapidly, or of too thin a quality, forms it too slowly, or has it too muddy – all the other organs, however distant, fall into a degree of inaction or suffering in the same proportion. Then, again, each of these organs or parts, however near or however remote, has its own sympathies with other organs; and among the rest, with the very organs from which the disturbance first emanated – the stomach, liver, etc. thus by action and reaction of one part upon another, a series of wrong influences is put in operation, which, like the flux and reflux of waves, continues to act and react as long as the first or primary abuse continues to be repeated; unless, indeed, in the over or increased action of a part, something gives way – of which there is always more or less danger – the disease follows. Of the nature of the disease, I have already spoken, though it must be obvious at a glance, that disease of any part may ensue, where, by reason of weakness or any other cause, there exists a predisposition. The weakened part of the system, as of the weakened or feeble part of a machine, will be apt to give way first, other things and circumstances being equal.
Suppose, for example, a coffee drinker is affected with brain fever. Perhaps he has drank his accustomed beverage, and disordered his stomach and liver, and roused and perpetuated a civil war in his system a thousand times; and has fifty times said that his coffee did these circumstances, a medical man, who had known his habits, should say his disease was caused by coffee. How would people stare! A brain fever induced by coffee!” they would say, with amazement. “Who ever heard of such a thing?” Yet no coffee drinker who is attacked by brain fever can be sure it is not the result of his unwise habit.
One more apology – for it does not deserve the name of argument – for tea and coffee drinking, remains to be mentioned. “if it really does harm, it does so little as to be almost unworthy of notice. Why not spend your strength upon alcohol, opium, or tobacco? Who levels dread artillery at a fly?
I am quite willing to grant – I have almost already granted – that the immediate, and even the remoter influence of a single cup of tea or coffee, were the abuse never to be repeated, would be inconsiderable. It is the consequences of many small doses in succession – or rather, their accumulated consequences – which we are to fear. Dr. Combe says, repeatedly, the ”health is more frequently undermined by the gradual operation of constant, though unperceived causes, than by any great and marked exposures of an accidental kind;” that, as in the great majority of instances, the breach of a natural law “becomes serious by the frequency of its repetition, rather than by a single act, so is the punishment gradual in its infliction, and slow in manifesting its accumulated effect.”
Besides, the actual amount of harm done is not the only test of the injury of a thing, especially by Christians. We have something else to do besides doing no harm. An inspired apostle has said, that whether we eat or drink, or whatsoever we do, all should be done to the glory of God. Do we use tea or coffee to the glory of God? It is the best drink we can use? It is a drink whose influence on ourselves and on those around us – on the well being of society generally – is more favorable than that of any other? Is it a drink whose use, down to the remotest generation, we wish to do the utmost we can to confirm, by our example?
As to its being a small thing, a word should be said. The tributaries of the Mississippi are small things; nevertheless, by their union, they make up the mighty flood which has been aptly enough designated as the father of waters. So of the numerous tributaries to that mighty streams which constantly flows into the sea of intemperance. We have many a workman employed in clearing the stream at its mouth; is there no need of his labors who shall seek to stay its ravages, by drying up one of its sources?
He who says coffee is a small thing, by the same rule should say that arsenic, or lead, or prussic acid, is a small thing. Persons who labor in furnaces and factories where they are exposed to the fumes of arsenic or lead, sometimes last on to forty or fifty years of age, though many die much earlier. Nothing can be more certain than the least amount of either of those metals is always the inevitably anti-vital in its tendency. Prussic acid – a drop of which will kill a small animal – may be so used that a person will bear a small quantity of it for a long time without apparent injury. Will any one attempt to say that this substance is not poisonous, because it poisons slowly?
Talk not of the nutritious property of coffee – much greater, I grant, than that of tea. It is not drank for its nutriment, but by one of a thousand. “But it saves food,” some will say. “Coffee drinkers are usually small eaters.” The same many be said of cider drinkers and wine drinkers. Is it therefore on account of the nutriment these liquors contain – which is in cider certainly very trifling? It is not because, as has been well said by Hahnemann, they destroy the individual who is satisfied with a single slice of bread and butter, or a single cracker or biscuit, and his bowl of strong coffee. Bad as gluttony is, I greatly prefer the strong appetite of the water drinker, along with his increased moral freedom and power to restrain it, to slavery to the coffee bowl. And I do not deny that since man will drink coffee, it is a blessing that it should destroy the appetite; for gluttony and coffee both, would double the danger which now comes single-handed.
-------- o --------
Estimates. Important considerations. Concluding remarks.
If the consumption of coffee in the United States is destined to increase for thirteen years to come, as it has done for thirteen years past, in proportion to the population, I see not but the expense in which the nation will be involved on account of it, during that period, must equally and perhaps exceed $2,000,000,000. The cost for the next century, for this article, must exceed $3,000,000,000.
In view of these considerations, let me earnestly entreat all who make the least claim to the name of philanthropist, or even patriot, to pause ere they resolve to contribute, by their example, to swell this mighty aggregate – to cause to flow far and wide and deep, this river of death.
Let not the appeal to patriotism be met by the cry – What would China do, if she could not find a market for her tea – and Arabia and the Indies, if they could not sell their coffee? The same outcry might have been made, and the same question asked a few years ago in relation to distilled and fermented drinks – beer, cider, brandy, etc. It is now found that the soil which will produce apple trees, will usually produce something else. And not a doubt can exist in the mind of a truly intelligent person, that the soil now devoted to tea and coffee, might be made to produce an abundance, of vegetable substances highly conductive to health and longevity.
If, however, in spite of all which has been said, there are to be found those who will persevere in the use of these poisonous drugs, they are entreated to consider, but for one short hour, what are the benefits to be derived from this amazing expenditure of money and waste of health.
Let me then have them consider what appropriation might be made of the time and money now squandered in this way – how much might be done by it in promoting social, intellectual and more improvement – how many school, village and town libraries might be purchased with the money – how many teachers’ seminaries in this and other countries might be sustained by it – how many preachers of the gospel, and teachers of temperance, physiology, health, and moral reform, might be scattered by it into our own and other parts of the world – and how many valuable books and tracts might be furnished by it to the brotherhood of mankind, and in their own native language.
Let them not forget the constitutional ills which are inherited. I know many a large family where not a child can be seen who is not the inheritor of ills produced by his parents’ irregularities; and I know of some families in which several children may be found, whose sufferings, beginning before they are a month old, will end only with their lives.
Let parents consider whether they are willing, for the mere sake of a little present gratification, to sow the seeds of pain and disease in a soil so productive as the tender frame of the susceptible infant and then, as the consequence of a just law, be compelled to reap a harvest of premature disease, decay or death, or at least an imbecile old age. How many children and young persons sink prematurely to the grave, while their parents, thought they are the cause, still retain considerable vigor – their early habits having been formed under better auspices. How many children, not actually sick, at only one third the parents’ age, seem half as old as the parents themselves! And whose is the error? On whom falls the guilt of so much suffering, premature decay or decrepitude, and premature death?
I am far indeed from saying – let me repeat the sentiment once for all – that tea and coffee are the sole authors of all the misery referred to; but they are certainly come in for a full share of it. They are among the numerous tributaries to the mighty stream of premature death. And he who effects a reform in this habits with regard to tea and coffee, though he were to retain, for a time, beer, cider, wine, or even alcohol, opium, or tobacco, has not only removed from his family two articles that never ought to have been received into it, but has begun a good work in the right way – by commencing at the foundation. Let the sources of intemperance and disease – the causes of an undue fondness for excitement and an unnatural thirst – be but dried up, and the larger streams which they have so long fed, will soon cease to flow, while the renovated and happier world will rejoice in their extermination.
* It might be worth while to inquire whether the transmission of the particles of an astringent, like tea, through the excretories of the skin, does not produce an effect not unlike that produced on hides in a tanner’s vat. The eaters of tea grounds are particularly noted, it is said, for this leathery complexion.
* Some estimate the whole expense fairly involved in the use of tea at $18,000,000. I am inclined to think it cannot be less.
* Well, indeed, were it for us, if coffee, or indeed coffee and tea, were, in this respect, alone. But there are a dozen, if not a score of substances in common, daily use, which have also a claim to the name of medicinal substances.
* This is merely the expense in money. The whole yearly expense, including the time, at a fair valuation, cannot be less than $25,000,000.